[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] backport of XSA-274 patch to 4.9.x kernel (could use a review)
I just got the following patch from a colleague. It's a backport of the XSA 274 kernel patch to 4.9.x kernels. The kernel patch given in the XSA would not apply cleanly. Would someone mind reviewing it? It would be much appreciated. commit b3681dd548d06deb2e1573890829dff4b15abf46 upstream. This version applies to v4.9. error_entry and error_exit communicate the user vs kernel status of the frame using %ebx. This is unnecessary -- the information is in regs->cs. Just use regs->cs. This makes error_entry simpler and makes error_exit more robust. It also fixes a nasty bug. Before all the Spectre nonsense, The xen_failsafe_callback entry point returned like this: ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK SAVE_C_REGS SAVE_EXTRA_REGS ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER jmp error_exit And it did not go through error_entry. This was bogus: RBX contained garbage, and error_exit expected a flag in RBX. Fortunately, it generally contained *nonzero* garbage, so the correct code path was used. As part of the Spectre fixes, code was added to clear RBX to mitigate certain speculation attacks. Now, depending on kernel configuration, RBX got zeroed and, when running some Wine workloads, the kernel crashes. This was introduced by: commit 3ac6d8c787b8 ("x86/entry/64: Clear registers for exceptions/interrupts, to reduce speculation attack surface") With this patch applied, RBX is no longer needed as a flag, and the problem goes away. Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: 3ac6d8c787b8 ("x86/entry/64: Clear registers for exceptions/interrupts, to reduce speculation attack surface") Reported-and-tested-by: "M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sarah Newman <srn@xxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 19 ++++--------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S index d58d8dc..0dab47a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ ENTRY(\sym) call \do_sym - jmp error_exit /* %ebx: no swapgs flag */ + jmp error_exit .endif END(\sym) .endm @@ -1043,7 +1043,6 @@ END(paranoid_exit) /* * Save all registers in pt_regs, and switch gs if needed. - * Return: EBX=0: came from user mode; EBX=1: otherwise */ ENTRY(error_entry) cld @@ -1087,7 +1086,6 @@ ENTRY(error_entry) * for these here too. */ .Lerror_kernelspace: - incl %ebx leaq native_irq_return_iret(%rip), %rcx cmpq %rcx, RIP+8(%rsp) je .Lerror_bad_iret @@ -1119,28 +1117,19 @@ ENTRY(error_entry) /* * Pretend that the exception came from user mode: set up pt_regs - * as if we faulted immediately after IRET and clear EBX so that - * error_exit knows that we will be returning to user mode. + * as if we faulted immediately after IRET. */ mov %rsp, %rdi call fixup_bad_iret mov %rax, %rsp - decl %ebx jmp .Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs END(error_entry) - -/* - * On entry, EBX is a "return to kernel mode" flag: - * 1: already in kernel mode, don't need SWAPGS - * 0: user gsbase is loaded, we need SWAPGS and standard preparation for return to usermode - */ ENTRY(error_exit) - movl %ebx, %eax DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE) TRACE_IRQS_OFF - testl %eax, %eax - jnz retint_kernel + testb $3, CS(%rsp) + jz retint_kernel jmp retint_user END(error_exit) -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |