[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:00:24AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:30:42AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > --- a/tools/debugger/gdbsx/gx/gx_local.c > > +++ b/tools/debugger/gdbsx/gx/gx_local.c > > @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ prnt_32regs(struct xg_gdb_regs32 *r32p) > > static void > > prnt_64regs(struct xg_gdb_regs64 *r64p) > > { > > - printf("rip:"XGF64" rsp:"XGF64" flags:"XGF64"\n", r64p->rip, r64p->rsp, > > - r64p->rflags); > > + printf("rip:"XGF64" rsp:"XGF64" flags:%08x\n", r64p->rip, r64p->rsp, > > + r64p->eflags); > > I think it would be better to introduce XGF32 and XGFM32 in the header. I was inspired by prnt_32regs function, which use explicit %08x. Should it be changed there too (to PRIx32)? Otherwise that would be inconsistent (and maybe warrant a totally separate cleanup). -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |