[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/spec-ctrl: split reporting for PV and HVM guests
Putting them on separate lines was suggested before, and is going to become necessary eventually anyway as things get added here. Split them now, and put the respective pieces in CONFIG_* conditionals at the same time. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- v2: New. --- a/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c @@ -242,13 +242,8 @@ static void __init print_details(enum in * Alternatives blocks for protecting against and/or virtualising * mitigation support for guests. */ - printk(" Support for VMs: PV:%s%s%s%s, HVM:%s%s%s%s\n", - (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV) || - boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_PV) || - opt_eager_fpu) ? "" : " None", - boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV) ? " MSR_SPEC_CTRL" : "", - boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_PV) ? " RSB" : "", - opt_eager_fpu ? " EAGER_FPU" : "", +#ifdef CONFIG_HVM + printk(" Support for HVM VMs:%s%s%s%s\n", (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_HVM) || boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_HVM) || opt_eager_fpu) ? "" : " None", @@ -256,7 +251,16 @@ static void __init print_details(enum in boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_HVM) ? " RSB" : "", opt_eager_fpu ? " EAGER_FPU" : ""); +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_PV + printk(" Support for PV VMs:%s%s%s%s\n", + (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV) || + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_PV) || + opt_eager_fpu) ? "" : " None", + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV) ? " MSR_SPEC_CTRL" : "", + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_PV) ? " RSB" : "", + opt_eager_fpu ? " EAGER_FPU" : ""); + printk(" XPTI (64-bit PV only): Dom0 %s, DomU %s (with%s PCID)\n", opt_xpti & OPT_XPTI_DOM0 ? "enabled" : "disabled", opt_xpti & OPT_XPTI_DOMU ? "enabled" : "disabled", _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |