[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11 01/11] x86/cpu: Introduce vmce_save_vcpu_ctxt_one() func
>>> On 13.07.18 at 11:04, <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Changes since V10: > - Add memset to 0 for ctxt. Why? What's wrong with ... > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c > @@ -349,6 +349,20 @@ int vmce_wrmsr(uint32_t msr, uint64_t val) > return ret; > } > > +static int vmce_save_vcpu_ctxt_one(struct vcpu *v, hvm_domain_context_t *h) > + { > + struct hvm_vmce_vcpu ctxt; > + > + memset(&ctxt, 0, sizeof(ctxt)); struct hvm_vmce_vcpu ctxt = {}; instead? Or even pulling all of this ... > + ctxt.caps = v->arch.vmce.mcg_cap; > + ctxt.mci_ctl2_bank0 = v->arch.vmce.bank[0].mci_ctl2; > + ctxt.mci_ctl2_bank1 = v->arch.vmce.bank[1].mci_ctl2; > + ctxt.mcg_ext_ctl = v->arch.vmce.mcg_ext_ctl; ... into the initializer, which will make sure padding fields are zero. I can see that a memset() is warranted in _some_ cases, but not uniformly. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |