[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/8] x86/shim: fully ignore "nosmp" and "maxcpus="

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:02:09 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:02:40 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:11:36AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> In the shim case, the number of CPUs should be solely controlled by the
> guest configuration file. Make sure the command line options are fully
> (and not just partially) ignored.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/8] x86: (allow to) suppress use of hyper-threading
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/8] x86/shim: fully ignore "nosmp" and "maxcpus="
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] xen/x86: declare the efi symbol as weak
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] Fixes to build with lld 6.0.0
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/8] x86/shim: fully ignore "nosmp" and "maxcpus="
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/8] cpumask: tidy {,z}alloc_cpumask_var()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.