[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: correct first_dirty calculations during block merging
>>> On 10.07.18 at 16:49, <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Currently it's possible to hit an assertion in alloc_heap_pages(): > > Assertion 'first_dirty != INVALID_DIRTY_IDX || !(pg[i].count_info & > PGC_need_scrub)' failed at page_alloc.c:988 > > This can happen because a piece of logic to calculate first_dirty > during block merging in free_heap_pages() is missing for the following > scenario: > > 1. Current block's first_dirty equals to INVALID_DIRTY_IDX > 2. Successor block is free but its first_dirty != INVALID_DIRTY_IDX > 3. The successor is merged into current block > 4. Current block's first_dirty still equals to INVALID_DIRTY_IDX > > This will trigger the assertion during allocation of such block in > alloc_heap_pages() because there will be pages with PGC_need_scrub > bit set despite the claim of first_dirty that the block is scrubbed. > > Add the missing piece of logic and slightly update the comment for > the predecessor case to better capture the code's intent. > > Fixes 1a37f33ea613 ("mm: Place unscrubbed pages at the end of pagelist") > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> > CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/common/page_alloc.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > index 20ee1e4897..aa911f2dc5 100644 > --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c > +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > @@ -1426,7 +1426,7 @@ static void free_heap_pages( > > page_list_del(predecessor, &heap(node, zone, order)); > > - /* Keep predecessor's first_dirty if it is already set. */ > + /* Keep block's first_dirty if the predecessor doesn't have one > */ > if ( predecessor->u.free.first_dirty == INVALID_DIRTY_IDX && > pg->u.free.first_dirty != INVALID_DIRTY_IDX ) > predecessor->u.free.first_dirty = (1U << order) + How about "Convert pg's first_dirty if predecessor doesn't already have one"? "Keep" isn't describing well enough what's being done here imo. Also, despite both styles being okay, I'd prefer to retain the full stop. > @@ -1447,6 +1447,12 @@ static void free_heap_pages( > > check_and_stop_scrub(successor); > > + /* Keep successor's first_dirty if the block doesn't have one */ > + if ( pg->u.free.first_dirty == INVALID_DIRTY_IDX && > + successor->u.free.first_dirty != INVALID_DIRTY_IDX ) > + pg->u.free.first_dirty = (1U << order) + > + successor->u.free.first_dirty; Same then accordingly here (and both doable while committing, provided you agree) and then Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |