[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [Notes for xen summit 2018 design session] Process changes: is the 6 monthly release Cadence too short, Security Process, ...
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [Notes for xen summit 2018 design session]
Process changes: is the 6 monthly release Cadence too short, Security Process,
..."):
> Osstest is really resource intense and heavy weight. We need to think of
> a way to reduce its turnaround time. Or we can introduce other
> auxiliary test systems to reduce its burden.
We should pursue both of these strategies simultaneously.
I have a plan to improve osstest's efficiency by having it reinstall
test hosts less often. But of course there's only one of me and there
is often a fire to be put out (and automated firefighting machinery to
develop).
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
- References:
- [Xen-devel] [Notes for xen summit 2018 design session] Process changes: is the 6 monthly release Cadence too short, Security Process, ...
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Notes for xen summit 2018 design session] Process changes: is the 6 monthly release Cadence too short, Security Process, ...
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Notes for xen summit 2018 design session] Process changes: is the 6 monthly release Cadence too short, Security Process, ...
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Notes for xen summit 2018 design session] Process changes: is the 6 monthly release Cadence too short, Security Process, ...
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Notes for xen summit 2018 design session] Process changes: is the 6 monthly release Cadence too short, Security Process, ...
|