[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/10] vpci/msix: add teardown cleanup
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:55:37PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:54:20AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:52:07AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 04:42:28PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > > > So that interrupts are properly freed. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c > > > > index 6132f576b6..cfca1cd43a 100644 > > > > --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c > > > > +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c > > > > @@ -450,7 +450,48 @@ static int init_msix(struct pci_dev *pdev) > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > -REGISTER_VPCI_INIT(init_msix, NULL, VPCI_PRIORITY_HIGH); > > > > + > > > > +static void teardown_msix(struct pci_dev *pdev) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct vpci_msix *msix = pdev->vpci->msix; > > > > + unsigned int i; > > > > + > > > > + if ( !msix ) > > > > + return; > > > > + > > > > + if ( msix->enabled ) > > > > + { > > > > + /* Disable MSIX. */ > > > > + unsigned int pos = pci_find_cap_offset(pdev->seg, pdev->bus, > > > > + PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), > > > > + PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn), > > > > + PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX); > > > > + uint16_t control = pci_conf_read16(pdev->seg, pdev->bus, > > > > + PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), > > > > + PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn), > > > > + msix_control_reg(pos)); > > > > + > > > > + pci_conf_write16(pdev->seg, pdev->bus, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), > > > > + PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn), msix_control_reg(pos), > > > > + (control & ~PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE)); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + write_lock(&pdev->domain->arch.hvm_domain.msix_lock); > > > > + list_del(&pdev->vpci->msix->next); > > > > + write_unlock(&pdev->domain->arch.hvm_domain.msix_lock); > > > > + > > > > + for ( i = 0; i < msix->max_entries && msix->enabled; i++ ) > > > > > > Maybe lift checking msix->enabled outside of the loop? Afaict nothing > > > in the loop manipulates that flag. > > > > I've done it that way to skip one indentation level, but I can put it > > outside if that's preferred. > > I would say if you really don't want to indent one more level. > > if ( !msix->enabled ) > return; > > for ( ... ) { } > > A possibly dumb question: why are the entries not freed as your disable > hardware MSIX? I'm not sure I understand the question. You cannot free specific entries, they are part of the msix struct (you have to free the whole struct, not specific entries). > Can you reshuffle code to make that happen? Say, first > take the structure of the list then disable MSI-X and free all entries. > > If that's not possible then I think better explanation is needed why the > code is structured like this, because it appears there is some very > intricate sequence required. I can reshuffle the code so it's easier to parse, let me do that. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |