|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] x86/vmx: Improvements to LBR MSR handling
>>> On 08.06.18 at 20:48, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -3106,14 +3104,13 @@ static int vmx_msr_write_intercept(unsigned int msr,
> uint64_t msr_content)
> for ( ; (rc == 0) && lbr->count; lbr++ )
> for ( i = 0; (rc == 0) && (i < lbr->count); i++ )
> if ( (rc = vmx_add_guest_msr(v, lbr->base + i)) == 0 )
> - {
> vmx_clear_msr_intercept(v, lbr->base + i,
> VMX_MSR_RW);
> - if ( lbr_tsx_fixup_needed )
> - v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_fixup_enabled |=
> FIXUP_LBR_TSX;
> - if ( bdw_erratum_bdf14_fixup_needed )
> - v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_fixup_enabled |=
> - FIXUP_BDW_ERRATUM_BDF14;
> - }
> +
> + v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_flags |= LBR_MSRS_INSERTED;
> + if ( lbr_tsx_fixup_needed )
> + v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_flags |= LBR_FIXUP_TSX;
> + if ( bdw_erratum_bdf14_fixup_needed )
> + v->arch.hvm_vmx.lbr_flags |= LBR_FIXUP_BDF14;
Note how the setting of the flags previously depended on
vmx_add_guest_msr() having returned success at least once.
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
> @@ -156,7 +156,12 @@ struct arch_vmx_struct {
> /* Are we emulating rather than VMENTERing? */
> uint8_t vmx_emulate;
>
> - uint8_t lbr_fixup_enabled;
> + /* Flags for LBR MSRs in the load/save lists. */
> +#define LBR_MSRS_INSERTED (1u << 0)
> +#define LBR_FIXUP_TSX (1u << 1)
> +#define LBR_FIXUP_BDF14 (1u << 2)
> +#define LBR_FIXUP_MASK (LBR_FIXUP_TSX | LBR_FIXUP_BDF14)
> + uint8_t lbr_flags;
I'm not overly happy with these getting moved to a non-private header,
but I assume you need to use the new flag in vmcs.c in a later patch.
Let's hope no other LBR_-prefixed names appear elsewhere in the code.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |