[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.11] scripts/add_maintainers.pl: Don't call get_maintainers.pl with -f
- To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:06:52 +0100
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim \(Xen.org\)" <tim@xxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 10:07:01 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Hi,
On 05/06/18 19:26, Lars Kurth wrote:
On 05/06/2018, 19:15, "Juergen Gross" <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/06/18 18:39, Julien Grall wrote:
> The option -f of scripts/get_maintainers.pl will return the maintainers
> of a given file, *not* the list of maintainers if the file was a patch.
>
> The output expected of add_maintainers is the latter, so drop the option
> -f.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
Release-acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx
This change in behaviour was mistakenly introduced in one of the later
revisions (can't recall which), when we refactored the call to
get_maintainers.pl
Thank you! Other than that the script is working quite well and save me
time to add all the CCs.
I will commit the patch once we branched.
Cheers,
Lars
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
