Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

[Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 14:57 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 12:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > What if we 1) have two versions of the test -- "Fake suspend" and
> > > "Real Suspend"; 2) only run "Real suspend" on hardware
> > > specifically
> > > marked as having a suspend that works reliably; 3) default all
> > > hardware to 'false' until we do some testing to find out how
> > > reliable
> > > it is?
> > > 
>
> OK, for starters, how about we add the fake suspend test to every
> flight.
> 
> Do we want or need to do that test with a guest running ?
> 
Doing it with a guest running would be more complete, I think.

I think the best would be to do both, i.e.:
- suspend without any guest
- (when resumed) start a guest
- suspend with a guest

Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Software Engineer @ SUSE https://www.suse.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel