Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Input: xen-kbdfront - allow better run-time configuration

[Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/19/2018 04:10 PM, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko
> <andr2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ok, so I'll send v2 with the following changes:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
> > b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
> > index a3306aad40b0..d8cca212f737 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
> > @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ module_param_array(ptr_size, int, NULL, 0444);
> >   MODULE_PARM_DESC(ptr_size,
> >          "Pointing device width, height in pixels (default 800,600)");
> >
> > -static unsigned int no_ptr_dev;
> > -module_param(no_ptr_dev, uint, 0);
> > +static bool no_ptr_dev;
> > +module_param(no_ptr_dev, bool, 0);
> >   MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_ptr_dev,
> >          "If set then no virtual pointing device exposed to the guest");
> >
> > -static unsigned int no_kbd_dev;
> > -module_param(no_kbd_dev, uint, 0);
> > +static bool no_kbd_dev;
> > +module_param(no_kbd_dev, bool, 0);
> >   MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_kbd_dev,
> >          "If set then no virtual keyboard device exposed to the guest");
> I prefer direct logic over inverse logic.  Maybe just use kbd_dev,
> default to true, but allow it to be set off?
>
> static bool kbd_dev = true;
> module_param(kbd_dev, bool, 0);
I have no preference here, either way works for me
Juergen, what do you think about the above?
> Regards,
> Jason

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel