[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxl: allow libxl_domain_suspend to simply suspend a domain, without saving it
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 04:45:51PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] libxl: allow > libxl_domain_suspend to simply suspend a domain, without saving it"): > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:20:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > I agree that libxl_domain_suspend is an unfortunate name, but can't we > > > come up with an alternative new name ? It does seem odd to bundle > > > this into _save. > > > > libxl_domain_just_suspend ? > > How about libxl_domain_suspend_only ? Fine with me too. Should I add also #define HAVE_DOMAIN_SUSPEND_ONLY or such? -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |