[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86: use invpcid to do global flushing
On 12/03/18 13:59, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> 03/09/18 7:05 PM >>> >> On 09/03/18 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 05.03.18 at 10:50, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> @@ -120,11 +121,24 @@ unsigned int flush_area_local(const void *va, >>>> unsigned int flags) >>>> else >>>> { >>>> u32 t = pre_flush(); >>>> - unsigned long cr4 = read_cr4(); >>>> >>>> - write_cr4(cr4 & ~X86_CR4_PGE); >>>> - barrier(); >>>> - write_cr4(cr4); >>>> + if ( !cpu_has_invpcid ) >>>> + { >>>> + unsigned long cr4 = read_cr4(); >>>> + >>>> + write_cr4(cr4 & ~X86_CR4_PGE); >>>> + barrier(); >>>> + write_cr4(cr4); >>>> + } >>>> + else >>>> + { >>>> + /* >>>> + * Using invpcid to flush all mappings works >>>> + * regardless of whether PCID is enabled or not. >>>> + * It is faster than read-modify-write CR4. >>>> + */ >>>> + invpcid_flush_all(); >>>> + } >>> >>> As just validly indicated by Jürgen, this is where my comment I >>> gave to one of his patches actually belongs: This is correct for >>> FLUSH_TLB_GLOBAL, but goes too far for FLUSH_TLB. >> >> And again it was so even before this patch. > > Not exactly - "before this patch" should include the state things were in > before > 32-bit code got removed. And that's where we had a proper separation between > flushes including and excluding global entries. And now that we regain that > ability, we should leverage it. Already working on it in my XPTI speed-up series. BTW: are you already working on rebasing your XPTI speed up series to current staging? I'd like my series to use your series as a base unless you are telling me you won't be able to resend your series soon. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |