Re: [Xen-devel] Radical proposal: ship not-fully-tidied shim as 4.10.1

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:49 AM, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: Radical proposal: ship not-fully-tidied shim as 
> 4.10.1"):
>> Does this sound fair?
>
> Everything is on fire.  Your proposal seems much less radical than
> mine.  I doubt it will produce a release to our users tomorrow, let
> alone this week.
>
> If we can't get agreement to commit an under-reviewed and under-tested
> series to staging-4.10, then IMO we should fork 4.10 and make an
> emergency security release off the fork, instead.

My series is on top of staging and I already have a backport to 4.9
and 4.10 stable published.

I will cherry pick as much as I can from Wei's branch this morning and
send out a v3.  I will try
to close the migration, hotplug, ballooning gap.

I do think it's useful for folks to review the series deeply.  It's
not that big so it should take all that
long to do so.

I think v3 of my series is likely the closest to something that can be
merged this week.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Ian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel