[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

To: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:26:33 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:23:36 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 12/27/2017 10:46 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to for-linus-4.15

-boris


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/input: do not advertise multi-touch pressure support
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 117543: trouble: blocked/broken/pass
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] 4.8.3 preparations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.