[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: tighten re-issue check in hvmemul_do_io()

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

I'm not sure why we had left out the address check in case of indirect
accesses (where "data" holds a guest physical address).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
@@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ static int hvmemul_do_io(
              (p.count > *reps) ||
              (p.dir != dir) ||
              (p.df != df) ||
-             (p.data_is_ptr != data_is_addr) )
+             (p.data_is_ptr != data_is_addr) ||
+             (data_is_addr && (p.data != data)) )
             domain_crash(currd);
 
         if ( data_is_addr )




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel