[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/9] x86/vvmx: Extract operand reading logic into operand_read()
>>> On 26.10.17 at 19:03, <euan.harris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c > @@ -361,6 +361,40 @@ static void reg_write(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > *pval = value; > } > > +static int operand_read(void *buf, struct vmx_inst_op *op, > + struct cpu_user_regs *regs, unsigned int bytes) > +{ > + if ( op->type == VMX_INST_MEMREG_TYPE_REG ) > + { > + switch ( bytes ) > + { > + case 4: > + *(uint32_t *)buf = reg_read(regs, op->reg_idx); > + > + case 8: > + *(uint64_t *)buf = reg_read(regs, op->reg_idx); > + > + default: > + ASSERT_UNREACHABLE(); > + return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE; > + } Looks like there are two missing break statements up there. > + return X86EMUL_OKAY; This and ... > + } > + else > + { > + pagefault_info_t pfinfo; > + int rc = hvm_copy_from_guest_linear(buf, op->mem, bytes, 0, &pfinfo); > + > + if ( rc == HVMTRANS_bad_linear_to_gfn ) > + hvm_inject_page_fault(pfinfo.ec, pfinfo.linear); > + if ( rc != HVMTRANS_okay ) > + return X86EMUL_EXCEPTION; > + > + return X86EMUL_OKAY; ... this should become a uniform ... > + } ... return here. > @@ -440,7 +474,12 @@ static int decode_vmx_inst(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > decode->op[0].type = VMX_INST_MEMREG_TYPE_REG; > decode->op[0].reg_idx = info.fields.reg1; > if ( poperandS != NULL ) > - *poperandS = reg_read(regs, decode->op[0].reg_idx); > + { > + int rc = operand_read(poperandS, &decode->op[0], regs, > + decode->op[0].len); > + if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY ) Blank line between declaration(s) and statement(s) please. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |