[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/16] SUPPORT.md: Add some x86 features
>>> On 21.11.17 at 13:24, <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Nov 21, 2017, at 11:35 AM, Jan Beulich >> Much depends on whether you think "guest" == "DomU". To me >> Dom0 is a guest, too. > > That’s not how I’ve ever understood those terms. > > A guest at a hotel is someone who is served, and who does not have (legal) > access to the internals of the system. The maids who clean the room and the > janitors who sweep the floors are hosts, because they have (to various > degrees) extra access designed to help them serve the guests. > > A “guest” is a virtual machine that does not have access to the internals of > the system; that is the “target” of virtualization. As such, the dom0 kernel > and all the toolstack / emulation code running in domain 0 are part of the > “host”. > > Domain 0 is a domain and a VM, but only domUs are guests. Okay then; just FTR I've always been considering "domain" == "guest" == "VM". Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |