[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 04/11] public: xen.h: add definitions for UUID handling



Hi Jan,

On 11/10/17 09:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.10.17 at 01:24, <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
--- a/xen/include/public/xen.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/xen.h
@@ -930,6 +930,39 @@ __DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(uint16, uint16_t);
  __DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(uint32, uint32_t);
  __DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(uint64, uint64_t);
+typedef struct {
+    uint8_t a[16];
+} xen_uuid_t;
+
+/*
+ * XEN_DEFINE_UUID(0x00112233, 0x4455, 0x6677, 0x8899,
+ *                 0xaa, 0xbb, 0xcc, 0xdd, 0xee, 0xff)
+ * will construct UUID 00112233-4455-6677-8899-aabbccddeeff presented as
+ * {0x00, 0x11, 0x22, 0x33, 0x44, 0x55, 0x66, 0x77, 0x88,
+ * 0x99, 0xaa, 0xbb, 0xcc, 0xdd, 0xee, 0xff};
+ *
+ * NB: This is compatible with Linux kernel and with libuuid, but it is not
+ * compatible with Microsoft, as they use mixed-endian encoding (some
+ * components are little-endian, some are big-endian).
+ */
+#define XEN_DEFINE_UUID_(a, b, c, d, e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6)            \
+    {{((a) >> 24) & 0xFF, ((a) >> 16) & 0xFF,                           \
+      ((a) >>  8) & 0xFF, ((a) >>  0) & 0xFF,                           \
+      ((b) >>  8) & 0xFF, ((b) >>  0) & 0xFF,                           \
+      ((c) >>  8) & 0xFF, ((c) >>  0) & 0xFF,                           \
+      ((d) >>  8) & 0xFF, ((d) >>  0) & 0xFF,                           \
+                e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6}}
+
+/* Compound literals are supported in C99 and later. */
+#if defined (__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L
+#define XEN_DEFINE_UUID(a, b, c, d, e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6)             \
+    ((xen_uuid_t)XEN_DEFINE_UUID_(a, b, c, d, e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6))
+#else
+#define XEN_DEFINE_UUID(a, b, c, d, e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6)             \
+    XEN_DEFINE_UUID_(a, b, c, d, e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6)
+
+#endif /* defined (__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L */
+
  #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
/* Default definitions for macros used by domctl/sysctl. */

This looks good to me, but I would like to get Jan's opinion on this.
Ideally we would commit the series tomorrow before the code freeze.

While I can live with it being the way it is now, I've already
indicated that I'd prefer __GNUC__ to also be checked for
here. As that's a relaxation, it wouldn't be a problem to add
later, I think (but I can't exclude I'm overlooking something,
so it would feel better if it was done the intended final way
from the beginning).

To be clear, you ask to do:

#if defined(__GNUC__) || (defined(__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L)

am I correct?

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.