[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 03/14] x86/vvmx: use np2m_flush_base() for INVEPT_SINGLE_CONTEXT

To: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:05:33 +0100
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:06:20 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 09/04/2017 09:14 AM, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> nvmx_handle_invept() updates current's np2m just to flush it. Instead,
> use the new np2m_flush_base() directly for this purpose.

This one and the previous one look good, but it seems like it would be
better to have them as a single patch.

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 00/14] Nested p2m: allow sharing between vCPUs
  - From: Sergey Dyasli
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 03/14] x86/vvmx: use np2m_flush_base() for INVEPT_SINGLE_CONTEXT
  - From: Sergey Dyasli

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 113823: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 04/14] x86/np2m: remove np2m_base from p2m_get_nestedp2m()
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 03/14] x86/vvmx: use np2m_flush_base() for INVEPT_SINGLE_CONTEXT
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 09/14] x86/np2m: add p2m_get_nestedp2m_locked()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.