Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 113819: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 113819: regressions 
- trouble: broken/fail/pass"):
> >  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4          <job status>                 broken  in 
> > 113816
> >  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5       63 leak-check/check         fail REGR. vs. 
> > 113387
> 
> This is:
> 
> Sep 26 04:50:27.951159 (XEN) Assertion 'ctxt->event_pending == (rc == 
> X86EMUL_EXCEPTION)' failed at x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c:7963
> Sep 26 04:50:27.967093 (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.10-unstable  x86_64  debug=y   
> Tainted:    H ]----
> 
> Which a fix has already been committed for.
> 
> However, OSSTest should be identifying that the cpuid-faulting test had
> regressed.  I am confused...

You mean  xtf/test-pv32pae-cpuid-faulting  ?

It says:

> > Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
> >  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 62 xtf/test-pv32pae-cpuid-faulting fail blocked in 
> > 113387

113387 is one of the tests of the baseline.  In that test it was
skipped.  The job status is actually "skip" not "blocked" (and there
is a slight infelicity of the reporting here).

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel