|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 11/15] xen: delay allocation of grant table sub structures
>>> On 20.09.17 at 11:44, <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20/09/17 11:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 20.09.17 at 08:34, <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> @@ -3381,75 +3425,21 @@ grant_table_create(
>>> struct domain *d)
>>> {
>>> struct grant_table *t;
>>> - unsigned int i, j;
>>>
>>> if ( (t = xzalloc(struct grant_table)) == NULL )
>>> - goto no_mem_0;
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> /* Simple stuff. */
>>> percpu_rwlock_resource_init(&t->lock, grant_rwlock);
>>> spin_lock_init(&t->maptrack_lock);
>>> - t->nr_grant_frames = INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES;
>>> -
>>> - /* Active grant table. */
>>> - if ( (t->active = xzalloc_array(struct active_grant_entry *,
>>> - max_nr_active_grant_frames)) == NULL )
>>> - goto no_mem_1;
>>> - for ( i = 0;
>>> - i < num_act_frames_from_sha_frames(INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES); i++
>>> )
>>> - {
>>> - if ( (t->active[i] = alloc_xenheap_page()) == NULL )
>>> - goto no_mem_2;
>>> - clear_page(t->active[i]);
>>> - for ( j = 0; j < ACGNT_PER_PAGE; j++ )
>>> - spin_lock_init(&t->active[i][j].lock);
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - /* Tracking of mapped foreign frames table */
>>> - t->maptrack = vzalloc(max_maptrack_frames * sizeof(*t->maptrack));
>>> - if ( t->maptrack == NULL )
>>> - goto no_mem_2;
>>> -
>>> - /* Shared grant table. */
>>> - if ( (t->shared_raw = xzalloc_array(void *, max_grant_frames)) == NULL
>>> )
>>> - goto no_mem_3;
>>> - for ( i = 0; i < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; i++ )
>>> - {
>>> - if ( (t->shared_raw[i] = alloc_xenheap_page()) == NULL )
>>> - goto no_mem_4;
>>> - clear_page(t->shared_raw[i]);
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - /* Status pages for grant table - for version 2 */
>>> - t->status = xzalloc_array(grant_status_t *,
>>> - grant_to_status_frames(max_grant_frames));
>>> - if ( t->status == NULL )
>>> - goto no_mem_4;
>>> -
>>> - for ( i = 0; i < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; i++ )
>>> - gnttab_create_shared_page(d, t, i);
>>> -
>>> - t->nr_status_frames = 0;
>>>
>>> /* Okay, install the structure. */
>>> d->grant_table = t;
>>> - return 0;
>>>
>>> - no_mem_4:
>>> - for ( i = 0; i < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; i++ )
>>> - free_xenheap_page(t->shared_raw[i]);
>>> - xfree(t->shared_raw);
>>> - no_mem_3:
>>> - vfree(t->maptrack);
>>> - no_mem_2:
>>> - for ( i = 0;
>>> - i < num_act_frames_from_sha_frames(INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES); i++
>>> )
>>> - free_xenheap_page(t->active[i]);
>>> - xfree(t->active);
>>> - no_mem_1:
>>> - xfree(t);
>>> - no_mem_0:
>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>> + if ( d->domain_id == 0 )
>>> + return grant_table_init(t);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> void
>>> @@ -3651,8 +3641,9 @@ int grant_table_set_limits(struct domain *d, unsigned
>>> int grant_frames,
>>>
>>> grant_write_lock(gt);
>>>
>>> - ret = 0;
>>> - /* Set limits, alloc needed arrays. */
>>> + /* Set limits. */
>>> + if ( !gt->active )
>>> + ret = grant_table_init(gt);
>>>
>>> grant_write_unlock(gt);
>>
>> These changes don't leave the domains in a state similar to that
>> before the change - I'm missing calls to gnttab_grow_table() to
>> establish the minimal sizes. Aiui so far there has been no
>> requirement for a domain to invoke GNTTABOP_setup_table if it
>> is happy with v1 and the minimum size.
>
> So you don't like gnttab_grow_table() being called when the guest tries
> to map the grant frames in this case?
I don't like it being called _only_ in that case.
> I can add the call of gnttab_grow_table() to grant_table_set_limits() in
> case you like that better.
And to grant_table_create() for the Dom0 case.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |