[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 11/15] xen: delay allocation of grant table sub structures
>>> On 20.09.17 at 11:44, <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 20/09/17 11:22, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 20.09.17 at 08:34, <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> @@ -3381,75 +3425,21 @@ grant_table_create( >>> struct domain *d) >>> { >>> struct grant_table *t; >>> - unsigned int i, j; >>> >>> if ( (t = xzalloc(struct grant_table)) == NULL ) >>> - goto no_mem_0; >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> >>> /* Simple stuff. */ >>> percpu_rwlock_resource_init(&t->lock, grant_rwlock); >>> spin_lock_init(&t->maptrack_lock); >>> - t->nr_grant_frames = INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; >>> - >>> - /* Active grant table. */ >>> - if ( (t->active = xzalloc_array(struct active_grant_entry *, >>> - max_nr_active_grant_frames)) == NULL ) >>> - goto no_mem_1; >>> - for ( i = 0; >>> - i < num_act_frames_from_sha_frames(INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES); i++ >>> ) >>> - { >>> - if ( (t->active[i] = alloc_xenheap_page()) == NULL ) >>> - goto no_mem_2; >>> - clear_page(t->active[i]); >>> - for ( j = 0; j < ACGNT_PER_PAGE; j++ ) >>> - spin_lock_init(&t->active[i][j].lock); >>> - } >>> - >>> - /* Tracking of mapped foreign frames table */ >>> - t->maptrack = vzalloc(max_maptrack_frames * sizeof(*t->maptrack)); >>> - if ( t->maptrack == NULL ) >>> - goto no_mem_2; >>> - >>> - /* Shared grant table. */ >>> - if ( (t->shared_raw = xzalloc_array(void *, max_grant_frames)) == NULL >>> ) >>> - goto no_mem_3; >>> - for ( i = 0; i < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; i++ ) >>> - { >>> - if ( (t->shared_raw[i] = alloc_xenheap_page()) == NULL ) >>> - goto no_mem_4; >>> - clear_page(t->shared_raw[i]); >>> - } >>> - >>> - /* Status pages for grant table - for version 2 */ >>> - t->status = xzalloc_array(grant_status_t *, >>> - grant_to_status_frames(max_grant_frames)); >>> - if ( t->status == NULL ) >>> - goto no_mem_4; >>> - >>> - for ( i = 0; i < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; i++ ) >>> - gnttab_create_shared_page(d, t, i); >>> - >>> - t->nr_status_frames = 0; >>> >>> /* Okay, install the structure. */ >>> d->grant_table = t; >>> - return 0; >>> >>> - no_mem_4: >>> - for ( i = 0; i < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; i++ ) >>> - free_xenheap_page(t->shared_raw[i]); >>> - xfree(t->shared_raw); >>> - no_mem_3: >>> - vfree(t->maptrack); >>> - no_mem_2: >>> - for ( i = 0; >>> - i < num_act_frames_from_sha_frames(INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES); i++ >>> ) >>> - free_xenheap_page(t->active[i]); >>> - xfree(t->active); >>> - no_mem_1: >>> - xfree(t); >>> - no_mem_0: >>> - return -ENOMEM; >>> + if ( d->domain_id == 0 ) >>> + return grant_table_init(t); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> } >>> >>> void >>> @@ -3651,8 +3641,9 @@ int grant_table_set_limits(struct domain *d, unsigned >>> int grant_frames, >>> >>> grant_write_lock(gt); >>> >>> - ret = 0; >>> - /* Set limits, alloc needed arrays. */ >>> + /* Set limits. */ >>> + if ( !gt->active ) >>> + ret = grant_table_init(gt); >>> >>> grant_write_unlock(gt); >> >> These changes don't leave the domains in a state similar to that >> before the change - I'm missing calls to gnttab_grow_table() to >> establish the minimal sizes. Aiui so far there has been no >> requirement for a domain to invoke GNTTABOP_setup_table if it >> is happy with v1 and the minimum size. > > So you don't like gnttab_grow_table() being called when the guest tries > to map the grant frames in this case? I don't like it being called _only_ in that case. > I can add the call of gnttab_grow_table() to grant_table_set_limits() in > case you like that better. And to grant_table_create() for the Dom0 case. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |