[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 11/15] xen: delay allocation of grant table sub structures
>>> On 20.09.17 at 08:34, <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > @@ -3381,75 +3425,21 @@ grant_table_create( > struct domain *d) > { > struct grant_table *t; > - unsigned int i, j; > > if ( (t = xzalloc(struct grant_table)) == NULL ) > - goto no_mem_0; > + return -ENOMEM; > > /* Simple stuff. */ > percpu_rwlock_resource_init(&t->lock, grant_rwlock); > spin_lock_init(&t->maptrack_lock); > - t->nr_grant_frames = INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; > - > - /* Active grant table. */ > - if ( (t->active = xzalloc_array(struct active_grant_entry *, > - max_nr_active_grant_frames)) == NULL ) > - goto no_mem_1; > - for ( i = 0; > - i < num_act_frames_from_sha_frames(INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES); i++ ) > - { > - if ( (t->active[i] = alloc_xenheap_page()) == NULL ) > - goto no_mem_2; > - clear_page(t->active[i]); > - for ( j = 0; j < ACGNT_PER_PAGE; j++ ) > - spin_lock_init(&t->active[i][j].lock); > - } > - > - /* Tracking of mapped foreign frames table */ > - t->maptrack = vzalloc(max_maptrack_frames * sizeof(*t->maptrack)); > - if ( t->maptrack == NULL ) > - goto no_mem_2; > - > - /* Shared grant table. */ > - if ( (t->shared_raw = xzalloc_array(void *, max_grant_frames)) == NULL ) > - goto no_mem_3; > - for ( i = 0; i < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; i++ ) > - { > - if ( (t->shared_raw[i] = alloc_xenheap_page()) == NULL ) > - goto no_mem_4; > - clear_page(t->shared_raw[i]); > - } > - > - /* Status pages for grant table - for version 2 */ > - t->status = xzalloc_array(grant_status_t *, > - grant_to_status_frames(max_grant_frames)); > - if ( t->status == NULL ) > - goto no_mem_4; > - > - for ( i = 0; i < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; i++ ) > - gnttab_create_shared_page(d, t, i); > - > - t->nr_status_frames = 0; > > /* Okay, install the structure. */ > d->grant_table = t; > - return 0; > > - no_mem_4: > - for ( i = 0; i < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES; i++ ) > - free_xenheap_page(t->shared_raw[i]); > - xfree(t->shared_raw); > - no_mem_3: > - vfree(t->maptrack); > - no_mem_2: > - for ( i = 0; > - i < num_act_frames_from_sha_frames(INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES); i++ ) > - free_xenheap_page(t->active[i]); > - xfree(t->active); > - no_mem_1: > - xfree(t); > - no_mem_0: > - return -ENOMEM; > + if ( d->domain_id == 0 ) > + return grant_table_init(t); > + > + return 0; > } > > void > @@ -3651,8 +3641,9 @@ int grant_table_set_limits(struct domain *d, unsigned > int grant_frames, > > grant_write_lock(gt); > > - ret = 0; > - /* Set limits, alloc needed arrays. */ > + /* Set limits. */ > + if ( !gt->active ) > + ret = grant_table_init(gt); > > grant_write_unlock(gt); These changes don't leave the domains in a state similar to that before the change - I'm missing calls to gnttab_grow_table() to establish the minimal sizes. Aiui so far there has been no requirement for a domain to invoke GNTTABOP_setup_table if it is happy with v1 and the minimum size. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |