Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V3 2/3] Tool/ACPI: DSDT extension to support more vcpus

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 09:02:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.09.17 at 16:13, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We need to be careful to not create local APIC entries with either
> > APIC or ACPI ID equal to 255 (and to also not create Processor objects
> > with ACPI ID of 255).
> 
> Why? An ACPI or APIC ID is still fine as long as it does only occur
> in x2APIC contexts.

That's what I was trying to reference to with "local APIC entries" and
"Processor objects" as opposed to "x2APIC entries" and "Processor
Devices", which are x2APIC contexts. AFAICT we are talking about the
same.

Roger.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel