[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/24] xen/arm: mm: Redefine mfn_to_virt to use typesafe
Hi Stefano, On 09/16/2017 12:56 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Julien Grall wrote:This add a bit more safety in the memory subsystem code. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/mm.c | 16 +++++++++------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c index 965d0573a4..5716ef1123 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct domain *dom_xen, *dom_io, *dom_cow; /* Override macros from asm/page.h to make them work with mfn_t */ #undef virt_to_mfn #define virt_to_mfn(va) _mfn(__virt_to_mfn(va)) +#undef mfn_to_virt +#define mfn_to_virt(mfn) __mfn_to_virt(mfn_x(mfn))/* Static start-of-day pagetables that we use before the allocators* are up. These are used by all CPUs during bringup before switching @@ -837,7 +839,7 @@ void __init setup_xenheap_mappings(unsigned long base_mfn, * Virtual address aligned to previous 1GB to match physical * address alignment done above. */ - vaddr = (vaddr_t)mfn_to_virt(base_mfn) & FIRST_MASK; + vaddr = (vaddr_t)__mfn_to_virt(base_mfn) & FIRST_MASK;Don't you think it would be better to do mfn_to_virt(_mfn(base_mfn)) in this patch? This is just bike-shedding, but I think it would be more obviously consistent. Other than that, it looks good. Well, last time I used mfn_x/_mfn in similar condition, you requested to use the __* version (see [1]). I really don't mind which one to use. But we should stay consistent with the macros to use for non-typesafe version. Cheers, [1] http://patches.linaro.org/patch/105386/ -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |