Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 113438: regressions - FAIL

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 04:14:29AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 14.09.17 at 10:49, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > flight 113438 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113438/ 
> > > 
> > > Regressions :-(
> > > 
> > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > > including tests which could not be run:
> > >  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 15 guest-saverestore.2 fail 
> > > REGR. vs. 113384
> > 
> > The first instance of this regression occurred with just the
> > "libxl: add PV display device driver interface" series applied, so it's
> > pretty certain there's something wrong in there. Are you in the
> > process of looking into this?
> > 
> 
> I looked into this this morning.
> 
> libxl: debug: libxl_qmp.c:296:qmp_handle_response: Domain 4:message type: 
> return
> xc: error: Dom 4 not suspended: (shutdown 0, reason 255): Internal error
> libxl: error: libxl_dom_suspend.c:474:libxl__domain_resume: Domain 
> 4:xc_domain_resume failed: Invalid argument
> libxl: debug: libxl_event.c:1869:libxl__ao_complete: ao 0x9e6700: complete, 
> rc=-3
> libxl: debug: libxl_domain.c:183:libxl_domain_resume: Domain 4:ao 0x9e6700: 
> inprogress: poller=0x9e4f80, flags=ic
> libxl: debug: libxl_event.c:1838:libxl__ao__destroy: ao 0x9e6700: destroy
> 
> It is a libxc call that failed. It didn't look to be related to the device
> framework changes.
> 
> I will have a closer look in the afternoon.

Also the failure happened in the second attempt of save/restore while
the first attempt succeeded. IIRC we've seen error like this before so I
was a bit hesitant to draw the conclusion whether it was related to
libxl changes at the moment.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel