[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] xl: enable per-VCPU extratime flag for RTDS
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 11:58 -0400, Meng Xu wrote: > diff --git a/tools/xl/xl_cmdtable.c b/tools/xl/xl_cmdtable.c > index ba0159d..1b03d44 100644 > --- a/tools/xl/xl_cmdtable.c > +++ b/tools/xl/xl_cmdtable.c > @@ -272,12 +272,13 @@ struct cmd_spec cmd_table[] = { > { "sched-rtds", > &main_sched_rtds, 0, 1, > "Get/set rtds scheduler parameters", > - "[-d <Domain> [-v[=VCPUID/all]] [-p[=PERIOD]] [-b[=BUDGET]]]", > + "[-d <Domain> [-v[=VCPUID/all]] [-p[=PERIOD]] [-b[=BUDGET]] [- > e[=EXTRATIME]]]", > "-d DOMAIN, --domain=DOMAIN Domain to modify\n" > "-v VCPUID/all, --vcpuid=VCPUID/all VCPU to modify or > output;\n" > " Using '-v all' to modify/output all vcpus\n" > "-p PERIOD, --period=PERIOD Period (us)\n" > "-b BUDGET, --budget=BUDGET Budget (us)\n" > + "-e EXTRATIME, --extratime=EXTRATIME EXTRATIME (1=yes, 0=no)\n" Extratime ? > }, > { "domid", > &main_domid, 0, 0, > diff --git a/tools/xl/xl_sched.c b/tools/xl/xl_sched.c > index 85722fe..5138012 100644 > --- a/tools/xl/xl_sched.c > +++ b/tools/xl/xl_sched.c > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int sched_rtds_domain_output( > libxl_domain_sched_params scinfo; > > if (domid < 0) { > - printf("%-33s %4s %9s %9s\n", "Name", "ID", "Period", > "Budget"); > + printf("%-33s %4s %9s %9s %10s\n", "Name", "ID", "Period", > "Budget", "Extra time"); > return 0; > } > Can you paste the output of: xl sched-rtds xl sched-rtds -d 0 xl sched-rtds -d 0 -v 1 xl sched-rtds -d 0 -v all with the series applied? > @@ -785,8 +801,9 @@ int main_sched_rtds(int argc, char **argv) > goto out; > } > if (((v_index > b_index) && opt_b) || ((v_index > p_index) && > opt_p) > - || p_index != b_index) { > - fprintf(stderr, "Incorrect number of period and budget\n"); > + || ((v_index > e_index) && opt_e) || p_index != b_index > + || p_index != e_index || b_index != e_index ) { > I don't think you need the `b_indes ! e_index` part. If p==b and p==e, it's automatically true that b==e. > @@ -820,7 +837,7 @@ int main_sched_rtds(int argc, char **argv) > r = EXIT_FAILURE; > goto out; > } > - } else if (!opt_p && !opt_b) { > + } else if (!opt_p && !opt_b && !opt_e) { > /* get per-vcpu rtds scheduling parameters */ > libxl_vcpu_sched_params scinfo; > libxl_vcpu_sched_params_init(&scinfo); > @@ -852,6 +869,7 @@ int main_sched_rtds(int argc, char **argv) > scinfo.vcpus[i].vcpuid = vcpus[i]; > scinfo.vcpus[i].period = periods[i]; > scinfo.vcpus[i].budget = budgets[i]; > + scinfo.vcpus[i].extratime = extratimes[i] ? 1 : > 0; > } > rc = sched_vcpu_set(domid, &scinfo); > } else { /* set params for all vcpus */ > @@ -860,6 +878,7 @@ int main_sched_rtds(int argc, char **argv) > xmalloc(sizeof(libxl_sched_params)); > scinfo.vcpus[0].period = periods[0]; > scinfo.vcpus[0].budget = budgets[0]; > + scinfo.vcpus[0].extratime = extratimes[0] ? 1 : 0; > But does these two hunks mean that if I pass `-e 10`, that is considered a legal way to enable extratime? Shouldn't we enforce (either here in xl or in libxl) the value to be 0 or 1 ? Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |