Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2] Add SUPPORT.md

[Rich Persaud <persaur@xxxxxxxxx>]

> On Sep 11, 2017, at 13:01, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> +### XSM & FLASK
> +
> +    Status: Experimental
> +
> +Compile time disabled
> +
> +### XSM & FLASK support for IS_PRIV
> +
> +    Status: Experimental

In which specific areas is XSM lacking in Functional completeness, Functional 
stability and/or Interface stability, resulting in "Experimental" status?  What 
changes to XSM would be needed for it to qualify for "Supported" status?

If there will be no security support for features in Experimental status, would 
Xen Project accept patches to fix XSM security issues?  Could downstream 
projects issue CVEs for XSM security issues, if these will not be issued by Xen 
Project?

Rich
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel