[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vt-d: use two 32-bit writes to update DMAR fault address registers
The 64-bit DMAR fault address is composed of two 32 bits registers DMAR_FEADDR_REG and DMAR_FEUADDR_REG. According to VT-d spec: "Software is expected to access 32-bit registers as aligned doublewords", a hypervisor should use two 32-bit writes to DMAR_FEADDR_REG and DMAR_FEUADDR_REG separately in order to update a 64-bit fault address, rather than a 64-bit write to DMAR_FEADDR_REG. Though I haven't seen any errors caused by such one 64-bit write on real machines, it's still better to follow the specification. Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> --- xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c index daaed0abbd..067c092214 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c @@ -1105,7 +1105,9 @@ static void dma_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t *mask) spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->register_lock, flags); dmar_writel(iommu->reg, DMAR_FEDATA_REG, msg.data); - dmar_writeq(iommu->reg, DMAR_FEADDR_REG, msg.address); + dmar_writel(iommu->reg, DMAR_FEADDR_REG, msg.address_lo); + if (x2apic_enabled) + dmar_writel(iommu->reg, DMAR_FEUADDR_REG, msg.address_hi); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->register_lock, flags); } -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |