[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 02/13] xen/pvcalls: implement frontend disconnect
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 07/31/2017 06:57 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Introduce a data structure named pvcalls_bedata. It contains pointers to > > the command ring, the event channel, a list of active sockets and a list > > of passive sockets. Lists accesses are protected by a spin_lock. > > > > Introduce a waitqueue to allow waiting for a response on commands sent > > to the backend. > > > > Introduce an array of struct xen_pvcalls_response to store commands > > responses. > > > > Implement pvcalls frontend removal function. Go through the list of > > active and passive sockets and free them all, one at a time. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > CC: boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx > > CC: jgross@xxxxxxxx > > --- > > drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 51 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c > > index a8d38c2..a126195 100644 > > --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c > > +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,29 @@ > > #include <xen/xenbus.h> > > #include <xen/interface/io/pvcalls.h> > > > > +#define PVCALLS_INVALID_ID UINT_MAX > > +#define PVCALLS_RING_ORDER XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER > > +#define PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING __CONST_RING_SIZE(xen_pvcalls, > > XEN_PAGE_SIZE) > > + > > +struct pvcalls_bedata { > > + struct xen_pvcalls_front_ring ring; > > + grant_ref_t ref; > > + int irq; > > + > > + struct list_head socket_mappings; > > + struct list_head socketpass_mappings; > > + spinlock_t pvcallss_lock; > > In the backend this is called socket_lock and (subjectively) it would > sound as a better name here too. I'll rename > > + > > + wait_queue_head_t inflight_req; > > + struct xen_pvcalls_response rsp[PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING]; > > +}; > > +static struct xenbus_device *pvcalls_front_dev; > > + > > +static irqreturn_t pvcalls_front_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) > > +{ > > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > > +} > > + > > static const struct xenbus_device_id pvcalls_front_ids[] = { > > { "pvcalls" }, > > { "" } > > @@ -27,6 +50,34 @@ > > > > static int pvcalls_front_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev) > > { > > + struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata; > > + struct sock_mapping *map = NULL, *n; > > + > > + bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&pvcalls_front_dev->dev); > > + > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(map, n, &bedata->socket_mappings, list) { > > + mutex_lock(&map->active.in_mutex); > > + mutex_lock(&map->active.out_mutex); > > + pvcalls_front_free_map(bedata, map); > > + mutex_unlock(&map->active.out_mutex); > > + mutex_unlock(&map->active.in_mutex); > > + kfree(map); > > I think this is the same issue as the one discussed for some other patch > --- unlocking and then immediately freeing a lock. Yes, I'll fix this too. > > + } > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(map, n, &bedata->socketpass_mappings, list) { > > + spin_lock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock); > > + list_del_init(&map->list); > > + spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock); > > + kfree(map); > > + } > > + if (bedata->irq > 0) > > + unbind_from_irqhandler(bedata->irq, dev); > > + if (bedata->ref >= 0) > > + gnttab_end_foreign_access(bedata->ref, 0, 0); > > + kfree(bedata->ring.sring); > > + kfree(bedata); > > + dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, NULL); > > + xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed); > > Should we first move the state to Closed and then free things up? Or it > doesn't matter? I believe that is already done by the xenbus driver: this function is supposed to be called after the frontend state is set to Closing. > > + pvcalls_front_dev = NULL; > > return 0; > > } > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |