Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul: correct EVEX register extension bit handling for non-64-bit modes

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 05.09.17 at 15:36, <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 05.09.17 at 15:07, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 10/07/17 08:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> What about the opcode independent cases?  We should check that the two
>> MBZ bits (currently an anonymous bitfield) are zero, and the MBS bit
>> (currently evex.evex) is set.
> 
> Yes, I could add these here right away instead of deferring until
> later.

I'll send an updated v2, but while doing the additions I've noticed
that the original patch title justified why the other checks weren't
being added at the same time.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel