Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/pv: drop gate_op prefix in emul-gate-op.c

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 31/08/17 13:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 31.08.17 at 13:45, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> There is only one function gate_op_read that needs to be modified.
> I'm fine with it just being read() here, but I can see this being possibly
> controversial. Please double check that Andrew isn't entirely opposed
> to it. An alternative suggestion would then be read_mem().

I'm not opposed generally, but simply 'read' has a chance of angering
Coverity, because it has inbuilt models for most functions specified by
core standards like POSIX.

read_mem() would be better.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel