[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/mm: merge ptwr and mmio_ro page fault handlers
On 30/08/17 18:11, Wei Liu wrote: > Provide a unified entry to avoid going through pte look-up, decode and > emulation cycle more than necessary. The path taken is determined by > the faulting address. > > Note that the order of checks is changed in the new function, but the > order of the checks is performed shouldn't matter. > > The sole caller is changed to use the new function. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > > xtf is happy with this change. Let me know if more tests can be done. Booting dom0 is probably the best easy test going. > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/mm.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/mm.h > index ec7ce3c8c8..85adafdfa2 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/mm.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/mm.h > @@ -511,10 +511,8 @@ extern int mmcfg_intercept_write(enum x86_segment seg, > int pv_emul_cpuid(uint32_t leaf, uint32_t subleaf, > struct cpuid_leaf *res, struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt); > > -int ptwr_do_page_fault(struct vcpu *, unsigned long, > - struct cpu_user_regs *); > -int mmio_ro_do_page_fault(struct vcpu *, unsigned long, > - struct cpu_user_regs *); > +int ptwr_or_mmio_ro_do_page_fault(struct vcpu *, unsigned long, > + struct cpu_user_regs *); pv_ro_page_fault() ? > > int audit_adjust_pgtables(struct domain *d, int dir, int noisy); > I was thinking something more like this extra delta (only compile tested) which drops rather more code. ~Andrew Attachment:
0001-extra.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |