[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] mm: Don't hold heap lock in alloc_heap_pages() longer than necessary
>>> On 30.08.17 at 14:59, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This patch has been applied to staging, but its got problems. The >>> following crash is rather trivial to provoke: >>> >>> ~Andrew >>> >>> (d19) Test result: SUCCESS >>> (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.10-unstable x86_64 debug=y Tainted: H ]---- >>> (XEN) CPU: 5 >>> (XEN) RIP: e008:[<ffff82d0802252fc>] >>> page_alloc.c#free_heap_pages+0x786/0x7a1 >>> ... >>> (XEN) Pagetable walk from ffff82ffffffffe4: >>> (XEN) L4[0x105] = 00000000abe5b063 ffffffffffffffff >>> (XEN) L3[0x1ff] = 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff >> Some negative offset into somewhere, it seems. Upon second >> look I think the patch is simply wrong in its current shape: >> free_heap_pages() looks for page_state_is(..., free) when >> trying to merge chunks, while alloc_heap_pages() now sets >> PGC_state_inuse outside of the locked area. I'll revert it right >> away. > > Yes, so we do need to update page state under heap lock. I'll then move > scrubbing (and checking) only to outside the lock. Actually I think you only need to set the first 4k page's state with the lock still held. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |