[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] passthrough: give XEN_DOMCTL_test_assign_device more sane semantics
>>> On 25.08.17 at 17:54, <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 25.08.17 at 17:25, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 06:20:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> So far callers of the libxc interface passed in a domain ID which was >>> then ignored in the hypervisor. Instead, make the hypervisor honor it >>> (accepting DOMID_INVALID to obtain original behavior), allowing to >>> query whether a device can be assigned to a particular domain. >>> >>> Drop XSM's test_assign_{,dt}device hooks as no longer being >>> individually useful. >> >> Can you also say in the commit message that you consolidate some code as >> well? > > Am I consolidating code beyond what is reasonable to achieve > the intended effect? I don't view the merging of the two case > blocks Oops, didn't finish here: "... as anything going beyond the main purpose of the patch. In fact if someone submitted a patch without doing that folding, I'd ask for it to be done." >> Assuming the disagreement on the semantics of the call is settled: >> >> Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> And didn't say "thanks" here. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |