[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH XEN v2] x86/pt: add a MSI unmask flag to XEN_DOMCTL_bind_pt_irq
>>> On 24.08.17 at 14:19, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @@ -438,6 +439,20 @@ int pt_irq_create_bind( > pi_update_irte(vcpu ? &vcpu->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc : NULL, > info, pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec); > > + if ( pt_irq_bind->u.msi.gflags & VMSI_UNMASKED ) > + { > + struct irq_desc *desc = pirq_spin_lock_irq_desc(info, NULL); > + > + if ( !desc ) > + { > + pt_irq_destroy_bind(d, pt_irq_bind); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + guest_mask_msi_irq(desc, false); > + spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock); > + } In v1 you've used spin_unlock_irqrestore() here - any reason you went to the less safe variant? I do understand it is correct, but I'd still prefer spin_{,un}lock_irq() to be avoided as much as possible. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |