Re: [Xen-devel] Regression PCI passthrough from 4.5.5 to 4.6.0-rc1

["Andreas Kinzler" <hfp@xxxxxxxxx>]

> > > From a brief look it looks like this would be doable, but the way  
> > these flags are being communicated is rather ugly (the values used here
> > > aren't part of the public interface, and hence it wasn't immediately
> > > clear whether using one of the unused bits would be an option, but
> > > it looks like it is).
> > Yes, it's not pretty... Last used bit is 15, hence bit 16 could be
> > used to signal to Xen whether the interrupt should be unmasked after
> > binding. I have a half-drafted patch, will finish it now.
> Andreas, could you please give a try to the attached two patches? One
> is for Xen and the other one is for QEMU.
Seems to work after I fixed a bug ;-)

-gflags |= masked ? 0 : XEN_PT_GFLAGSSHIFT_UNMASKED;
+gflags |= masked ? 0 : (1 << XEN_PT_GFLAGSSHIFT_UNMASKED);

Please let Jan and/or others review the patches.

Regards Andreas

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel