[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v15.1 13/23] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement CPU init flow.
On 17-08-03 23:42:01, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 08/04/17 5:23 AM >>> > >On 17-08-03 03:37:06, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 03.08.17 at 04:10, <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > @@ -1283,10 +1344,20 @@ static void psr_cpu_init(void) > >> > feat = feat_l3; > >> > feat_l3 = NULL; > >> > > >> > - if ( !cat_init_feature(®s, feat, info, FEAT_TYPE_L3_CAT) ) > >> > - feat_props[FEAT_TYPE_L3_CAT] = &l3_cat_props; > >> > - else > >> > - feat_l3 = feat; > >> > + if ( (regs.c & PSR_CAT_CDP_CAPABILITY) && (opt_psr & PSR_CDP) ) > >> > + { > >> > + /* If CDP init fails, try to work as L3 CAT. */ > >> > + if ( !cat_init_feature(®s, feat, info, FEAT_TYPE_L3_CDP) ) > >> > + feat_props[FEAT_TYPE_L3_CDP] = &l3_cdp_props; > >> > >> I'm disappointed to see that you didn't merge to two if()s, as > >> pointed out in v15 review. > >> > >Sorry, I missed this. A new patch 15.2 is sent out. Please help to review. > > Well, I suppose you've seen that I've committed the series (adjusting the > code above). Hence from now on it'll need to be incremental changes, > unless we'll find it necessary to revert due to the regression already > reported to you by Andrew. > > Jan Oh, I did not notice it. Thank you! So, I guess I should send out patches based on staging branch to fix the crash issue reported by Andrew and the pandoc issue reported by Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |