[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v15.1 13/23] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement CPU init flow.



On 17-08-03 23:42:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 08/04/17 5:23 AM >>>
> >On 17-08-03 03:37:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 03.08.17 at 04:10, <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > @@ -1283,10 +1344,20 @@ static void psr_cpu_init(void)
> >> >          feat = feat_l3;
> >> >          feat_l3 = NULL;
> >> >  
> >> > -        if ( !cat_init_feature(®s, feat, info, FEAT_TYPE_L3_CAT) )
> >> > -            feat_props[FEAT_TYPE_L3_CAT] = &l3_cat_props;
> >> > -        else
> >> > -            feat_l3 = feat;
> >> > +        if ( (regs.c & PSR_CAT_CDP_CAPABILITY) && (opt_psr & PSR_CDP) )
> >> > +        {
> >> > +            /* If CDP init fails, try to work as L3 CAT. */
> >> > +            if ( !cat_init_feature(®s, feat, info, FEAT_TYPE_L3_CDP) )
> >> > +                feat_props[FEAT_TYPE_L3_CDP] = &l3_cdp_props;
> >> 
> >> I'm disappointed to see that you didn't merge to two if()s, as
> >> pointed out in v15 review.
> >> 
> >Sorry, I missed this. A new patch 15.2 is sent out. Please help to review.
> 
> Well, I suppose you've seen that I've committed the series (adjusting the
> code above). Hence from now on it'll need to be incremental changes,
> unless we'll find it necessary to revert due to the regression already
> reported to you by Andrew.
> 
> Jan

Oh, I did not notice it. Thank you!

So, I guess I should send out patches based on staging branch to fix the
crash issue reported by Andrew and the pandoc issue reported by Wei.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.