[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] xl: enable per-VCPU work conserving flag for RTDS
On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 14:33 -0400, Meng Xu wrote: > --- a/tools/xl/xl_cmdtable.c > +++ b/tools/xl/xl_cmdtable.c > @@ -272,12 +272,13 @@ struct cmd_spec cmd_table[] = { > { "sched-rtds", > &main_sched_rtds, 0, 1, > "Get/set rtds scheduler parameters", > - "[-d <Domain> [-v[=VCPUID/all]] [-p[=PERIOD]] [-b[=BUDGET]]]", > + "[-d <Domain> [-v[=VCPUID/all]] [-p[=PERIOD]] [-b[=BUDGET]]] > [-w[=WORKCONSERVING]]", > "-d DOMAIN, --domain=DOMAIN Domain to modify\n" > "-v VCPUID/all, --vcpuid=VCPUID/all VCPU to modify or > output;\n" > " Using '-v all' to modify/output all vcpus\n" > "-p PERIOD, --period=PERIOD Period (us)\n" > "-b BUDGET, --budget=BUDGET Budget (us)\n" > + "-w WORKCONSERVING, -- > workconserving=WORKCONSERVING WORKCONSERVING (1=yes,0=no)\n" > Does this really need to accept a 1 or 0 parameter? Can't it be that, if -w is provided, the vCPU is marked as work-conserving, if it's not, it's considered reservation only. > --- a/tools/xl/xl_sched.c > +++ b/tools/xl/xl_sched.c > > @@ -279,8 +280,8 @@ static int sched_rtds_vcpu_output(int domid, > libxl_vcpu_sched_params *scinfo) > int i; > > if (domid < 0) { > - printf("%-33s %4s %4s %9s %9s\n", "Name", "ID", > - "VCPU", "Period", "Budget"); > + printf("%-33s %4s %4s %9s %9s %15s\n", "Name", "ID", > + "VCPU", "Period", "Budget", "Work conserving"); > return 0; > } > > @@ -290,12 +291,13 @@ static int sched_rtds_vcpu_output(int domid, > libxl_vcpu_sched_params *scinfo) > > domname = libxl_domid_to_name(ctx, domid); > for ( i = 0; i < scinfo->num_vcpus; i++ ) { > - printf("%-33s %4d %4d %9"PRIu32" %9"PRIu32"\n", > + printf("%-33s %4d %4d %9"PRIu32" %9"PRIu32" %15d\n", > As far as printing it goes, OTOH, I would indeed print a string, i.e., "yes", if the field is found to be 1 (true), or "no", if the field is found to be 0 (false). > @@ -702,14 +705,18 @@ int main_sched_rtds(int argc, char **argv) > int *vcpus = (int *)xmalloc(sizeof(int)); /* IDs of VCPUs that > change */ > int *periods = (int *)xmalloc(sizeof(int)); /* period is in > microsecond */ > int *budgets = (int *)xmalloc(sizeof(int)); /* budget is in > microsecond */ > + int *workconservings = (int *)xmalloc(sizeof(int)); /* budget is > in microsecond */ > Yeah, budget is in microseconds. But this is not budget! :-P In fact (jokes apart), it can be just a bool, can't it? Regadrs, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |