[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 15/24] ARM: NUMA: DT: Add CPU NUMA support



Hi Vijay,

On 18/07/17 12:41, vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

For each cpu, update cpu_to_node[] with node id from
the numa-node-id DT property. Also, initialize cpu_to_node[]
with node 0.

Add macros to access cpu_to_node[] information.

Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3: - Dropped numa_add_cpu declaration from asm-arm/numa.h
    - Dropped stale declarations
    - Call numa_add_cpu for cpu0
---
 xen/arch/arm/numa/numa.c   | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 xen/arch/arm/setup.c       |  2 ++
 xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c     | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h |  7 +++++++
 xen/include/asm-x86/numa.h |  1 -
 xen/include/xen/numa.h     |  1 +
 6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/numa/numa.c b/xen/arch/arm/numa/numa.c
index c00b92c..dc80aa5 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/numa/numa.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/numa/numa.c
@@ -22,11 +22,31 @@

 static uint8_t (*node_distance_fn)(nodeid_t a, nodeid_t b);

+/*
+ * Setup early cpu_to_node.
+ */
+void __init init_cpu_to_node(void)
+{
+    int i;
+
+    for ( i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++ )
+        numa_set_node(i, 0);
+}

From the comment: "Setup early cpu_to_node". However this is not how you are using it.

But I am not sure why it is even here...

+
 void numa_failed(void)
 {
     numa_off = true;
     init_dt_numa_distance();
     node_distance_fn = NULL;
+    init_cpu_to_node();
+}
+
+void __init numa_set_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int nid)
+{
+    if ( !node_isset(nid, processor_nodes_parsed) || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES )
+        nid = 0;

This looks wrong to me. If the node-id is invalid, why would you blindly set to 0?

+
+    numa_set_node(cpu, nid);
 }

 uint8_t __node_distance(nodeid_t a, nodeid_t b)
@@ -49,6 +69,7 @@ void __init numa_init(void)
     int ret = 0;

     nodes_clear(processor_nodes_parsed);
+    init_cpu_to_node();
     init_dt_numa_distance();

     if ( numa_off )
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
index a6d1499..b9c8b0d 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
@@ -787,6 +787,8 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,

     processor_id();

+    numa_add_cpu(0);
+
     smp_init_cpus();
     cpus = smp_get_max_cpus();
     printk(XENLOG_INFO "SMP: Allowing %u CPUs\n", cpus);
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
index 32e8722..fcf9afc 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <xen/timer.h>
 #include <xen/irq.h>
 #include <xen/console.h>
+#include <xen/numa.h>

Please use the alphabetical order.

 #include <asm/cpuerrata.h>
 #include <asm/gic.h>
 #include <asm/psci.h>
@@ -106,6 +107,7 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
         [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = MPIDR_INVALID
     };
     bool_t bootcpu_valid = 0;
+    nodeid_t *cpu_to_nodemap;
     int rc;

     mpidr = boot_cpu_data.mpidr.bits & MPIDR_HWID_MASK;
@@ -117,11 +119,18 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
         return;
     }

+    cpu_to_nodemap = xzalloc_array(nodeid_t, NR_CPUS);

Why do you need to allocate cpu_to_nodemap? Would not it be easier to put it on the stack as we do for other variable?

+    if ( !cpu_to_nodemap )
+    {
+        printk(XENLOG_WARNING "Failed to allocate memory for 
cpu_to_nodemap\n");
+        return;
+    }
+
     dt_for_each_child_node( cpus, cpu )
     {
         const __be32 *prop;
         u64 addr;
-        u32 reg_len;
+        uint32_t reg_len, nid;
         register_t hwid;

         if ( !dt_device_type_is_equal(cpu, "cpu") )
@@ -146,6 +155,15 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
             continue;
         }

+        if ( !dt_property_read_u32(cpu, "numa-node-id", &nid) )
+        {
+            printk(XENLOG_WARNING "cpu node `%s`: numa-node-id not found\n",
+                   dt_node_full_name(cpu));

numa-node-id is not mandatory. So you would print a warning on all non-NUMA platform. This not what we want.

+            nid = 0;
+        }
+
+        cpu_to_nodemap[cpuidx] = nid;
+
         addr = dt_read_number(prop, dt_n_addr_cells(cpu));

         hwid = addr;
@@ -224,6 +242,7 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
     {
         printk(XENLOG_WARNING "DT missing boot CPU MPIDR[23:0]\n"
                "Using only 1 CPU\n");
+        xfree(cpu_to_nodemap);
         return;
     }

@@ -233,7 +252,10 @@ static void __init dt_smp_init_cpus(void)
             continue;
         cpumask_set_cpu(i, &cpu_possible_map);
         cpu_logical_map(i) = tmp_map[i];
+        numa_set_cpu_node(i, cpu_to_nodemap[i]);
     }
+
+    xfree(cpu_to_nodemap);
 }

 void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
@@ -313,6 +335,7 @@ void start_secondary(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,
      */
     smp_wmb();

+    numa_add_cpu(cpuid);

Newline here please.

     /* Now report this CPU is up */
     cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_online_map);

diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
index d1dc83a..0d3146c 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
@@ -10,12 +10,19 @@ void init_dt_numa_distance(void);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 void numa_init(void);
 int dt_numa_init(void);
+void numa_set_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int nid);
+
 #else
 static inline void numa_init(void)
 {
     return;
 }

+static inline void numa_set_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int nid)
+{
+    return;
+}
+
 /* Fake one node for now. See also node_online_map. */
 #define cpu_to_node(cpu) 0
 #define node_to_cpumask(node)   (cpu_online_map)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/numa.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/numa.h
index ca0a2a6..fc4747f 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/numa.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/numa.h
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ extern nodeid_t acpi_setup_node(unsigned int pxm);
 extern void srat_detect_node(int cpu);

 extern nodeid_t apicid_to_node[];
-extern void init_cpu_to_node(void);

 void srat_parse_regions(paddr_t addr);
 unsigned int arch_get_dma_bitsize(void);
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/numa.h b/xen/include/xen/numa.h
index 10ef4c4..8a306e7 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/numa.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/numa.h
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ extern s8 acpi_numa;
 void numa_initmem_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);
 int srat_disabled(void);
 int valid_numa_range(paddr_t start, paddr_t end, nodeid_t node);
+void init_cpu_to_node(void);

You never used this function in common code. So why did you move it in the common headers?


 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 #define cpu_to_node(cpu)         (cpu_to_node[cpu])


Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.