[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Possible bug on ARM with irq passthrough
Hi Ivan, On 05/07/17 14:50, Ivan Pavic wrote: On 07/05/2017 02:55 PM, Julien Grall wrote:Hi Ivan, On 05/07/17 13:36, Ivan Pavic wrote:On 07/05/2017 01:27 PM, Julien Grall wrote:On 04/07/17 21:20, Ivan Pavić2 wrote:Hello,Hi Ivan,I'm testing IRQ latency on exynos5422. I'm using Xen 4.10-unstable. I used device passthrough for SPI irq 64. For guest domain I used FreeRTOS. When I use credit scheduler after destruction of domain, IRQ is released. I changed scheduler to credit2 and rtds at boot time and IRQ wasn't released after destruction. xl create dom-free-rtos.cfg fails with: libxl: error: libxl_create.c:1278:domcreate_launch_dm: Domain 5:failed give domain access to irq 64: Device or resource busy This is very strange because it doesn't happen with credit scheduler. This is output of xl dmesg: (XEN) IRQ 64 is already used by domain 1 Everything works first time but when I destroy domain and try to create again it fails. It works normally with credit scheduler. In dom-free-rtos.cfg: ... irqs = [64] ....The Domain 1 still seems to be alive, you can confirm by via "xl list". You said it works with credit but not credit2. I think you hit the bug described in [1].I checked xl-list. There is no domain with id 1, only dom0. Also I tried xenctx 1 which resulted in xc_domain_getinfo: No such process Same problem is with rtds scheduler. As I said, no problem with credit scheduler.IRQs assigned to a domain will be released by domain_vgic_free() when calling release_guest_irq(). This is called by Xen when the domain is fully destroyed. It might be possible the domain is waiting to be fully destroyed, and therefore hidden from the toolstack. Can you check if the domain is been destroyed by Xen. You can add printk in domain_destroy and complete_domain_destroy. * domain_destroy is called when there is no more reference on the domain (see put_domain) * complete_domain_destroy is called when RCU is quiescent If you got a message in the former, but not the latter. Then you hit the bug described in my previous e-mail.Yes, I've got message only in domain_destroy. Ok, so you are hitting the bug described in my previous e-mail. I would recommend to stick on credit1 until this bug is fixed (I will mark it as a blocker). Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |