Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.9 v3 3/3] xen/livepatch: Don't crash on encountering STN_UNDEF relocations

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

On 23/06/17 15:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:45:22PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 23/06/17 14:43, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 23/06/17 14:33, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > > On 23/06/17 14:32, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am a bit confused, the title says "PATCH for-4.9 v3 3/3". I haven't
> > > > > been CCed on the first two patches. Does it mean you are only looking
> > > > > at this patch to be in 4.9?
> > > > Sorry - I messed up the CC lists.  The correctness of this patch does
> > > > depend on the previous two, so all 3 are looking for inclusion.
> > > Given that we don't have livepatch testing in osstest how much test
> > > have we done on those 3 patches?
> > There is testing in OSSTest.
> Hurray hurray hurray!
> > I've manually run each of the scenarios, including with my livepatch
> > which has a STN_UNDEF relocation.
> >
> > I don't know what testing Konrad has done.
> I run a version of the same tests that are in OSSTest (basically an earlier
> version of the Perl code) and I have done it on x86 and on ARM32.
>
> And I also run the standalone OSSTest (on x86)
>
> And then I also do a livepatch using the livepatch-build-tools on x86 to
> patch some silly function.
>
> So from a testing perspective these patches have been tested very exhaustively.
Well it has not been tested on ARM64 :). I am about to do that.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel