[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.9] x86/boot: Fix the boot time relocation calculations
On 03/06/2017 11:22, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 05:57:46PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> c/s b28044226e1 "x86: make Xen early boot code relocatable" introduces >> >> mov $sym_offs(__image_base__),%esi >> >> to the legacy boot path. However, this is by definition 0, which means the >> boot code only functions correctly when Xen is loaded at its preferred >> physical address (2M at the time of writing). >> >> Xen does cope if loaded at an alternative physical address, if the >> MULTIBOOT2_TAG_TYPE_LOAD_BASE_ADDR tag is filled in properly. While recent >> versions of Grub do fill this in appropriately, tboot does not. (In fact, >> tboot loads Xen at the preferred address, but claims a load address of 8M.) > Does it use Multiboot or Multiboot2 protocol? Anyway, I think that this > should be fixed in tboot. In this case, MB2. Tboot should indeed be fixed, but that doesn't invalidate this fix. > >> Both multiboot 1 and 2 specify the execution environment as being flat. As a >> result, Xen needs no help calculating the proper load address. >> >> Calculate the load address from %eip alone, and ignore >> MULTIBOOT2_TAG_TYPE_LOAD_BASE_ADDR entirely. This fixes legacy boot under >> various versions of tboot. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> >> CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> >> CC: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This is a regression introduced in Xen 4.9, and should therefore be fixed. >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S | 15 ++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S b/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S >> index 5e84e42..df28b09 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S >> @@ -377,8 +377,10 @@ __start: >> cld >> cli >> >> - /* Load default Xen image load base address. */ >> - mov $sym_offs(__image_base__),%esi >> + /* Calculate the load base address. */ >> + call 1f >> +1: pop %esi >> + sub $sym_offs(1b), %esi > I have a problem with this. I know that this should be done in that way. Even > I considered that during my work on Multiboot2 stuff. However Multiboot and > Multiboot2 specs clearly say: The OS image must create its own stack as soon > as it needs one. So, we cannot assume here that %ss:%esp points to valid stack > and do such things. There is no possible way that %ss is bad. It must be a writeable segment (to be loaded in the first place) with 0 base and 4G limit (to fulfil the flat requirement). I see MB1 says that %esp is undefined. Where does the MB2 spec live these days (google doesn't seem to know)? > Even if it works with this and that right now. So, I would > prefer to fix it in more reliable way right now even if it means more code > here > and there. Does the EFI entry guarantee a good %rsp? That codepath doesn't sanitise %rsp before use. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |