Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7] ns16550: Add support for UART parameters to be specifed with name-value pairs

["Paratey, Swapnil" <sparatey@xxxxxxx>]

> > Should I submit a v8 with the "CONFIG_HAS_PCI" macro specifications for
> > the case statements? I apologize for not trying the build for ARM
> > beforehand.
> Yes please.
>
> ~Andrew
Should the contents of "enum serial_param_type" and
"static const struct serial_param_var __initconst sp_vars[]" also be separated
with the CONFIG_HAS_PCI macro? Or just the parts where the code gave errors
in the switch statement? If so, should I maintain the alphabetical order of
the parameters or should I separate them into blocks based on which parameters
are in the CONFIG_HAS_PCI space?


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel