Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.9 RC4 test result

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

On 25/05/17 09:01, Hao, Xudong wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.grall@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:40 PM
> > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: nd@xxxxxxx; Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>; George Dunlap
> > <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Kang, Luwei <luwei.kang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: Xen 4.9 RC4 test result
> >
> > Hello Xudong,
> >
> > On 23/05/2017 03:56, Hao, Xudong wrote:
> > > We performed Xen 4.9 RC4 testing on Intel Xeon Skylake, Broadwell,
> > > Haswell server platforms, verified many functional features on Xen 4.9.
> > > We'd like to share the result out.
> > Thank you for the testing.
> >
> > > Most of features passed to testing on Xen 4.9 RC4, RAS and nested has
> > > some bugs.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > RAS:
> > >
> > > 1.      xen-mceinj tool testing cause dom0 crash
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg108671.html
> > >
> > > 2.      CPU online/offline fail, Luwei is fixing it:
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg108660.html
> > I would recommend to tag the patch with for-4.9 + CC me if this is a regression
> > and you would like the patch to be included in the next release.
> It's a regression from Xen 4.8 to Xen 4.9. Yes, I'd like the patch be merged in 
> next release.
> The patch author Luwei already sent out v4, is it fine to reply the patch with 
> "[PATCH v4 for-4.9]" ?
I would also mention it in the e-mail explaining why you want it for Xen 
4.9.
Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel