[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 71420: tolerable FAIL

[Platform Team regression test user <citrix-osstest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This run is configured for baseline tests only.

flight 71420 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71420/

Failures :-/ but no regressions.

Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
 build-amd64-libvirt           5 libvirt-build                fail   like 71417
 build-i386-libvirt            5 libvirt-build                fail   like 71417

version targeted for testing:
 ovmf                 d727614c913449a59e8333c4d75cff4ebf1f9779
baseline version:
 ovmf                 1c47fcd465a496fe1d1493f97da02cb6b07364f5

Last test of basis    71417  2017-05-23 18:16:38 Z    0 days
Testing same since    71420  2017-05-24 12:18:35 Z    0 days    1 attempts

------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
  Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
  Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>

jobs:
 build-amd64-xsm                                              pass    
 build-i386-xsm                                               pass    
 build-amd64                                                  pass    
 build-i386                                                   pass    
 build-amd64-libvirt                                          fail    
 build-i386-libvirt                                           fail    
 build-amd64-pvops                                            pass    
 build-i386-pvops                                             pass    
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64                         pass    
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64                          pass    


------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.xs.citrite.net
logs: /home/osstest/logs
images: /home/osstest/images

Logs, config files, etc. are available at
    http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs

Test harness code can be found at
    http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary


Push not applicable.

------------------------------------------------------------
commit d727614c913449a59e8333c4d75cff4ebf1f9779
Author: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue May 23 09:47:26 2017 +0800

    ShellPkg/UefiShellLib: Avoid reading undefined content before string
    
    https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566
    
    In function InternalShellPrintWorker(), if the string in variable
    'mPostReplaceFormat2' starts with character L'%', the following
    expression:
    
    *(ResumeLocation-1) == L'^' at line 2831
    
    will read an undefined value before the starting of string
    'mPostReplaceFormat2'.
    
    This commit adds additional logic to avoid reading undefined content.
    
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
    Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 2d499388452cf8215265a0757395e7dbcdb32ea8
Author: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue May 23 17:02:05 2017 +0800

    BaseTools: Fix the bug that different DSC file use same build output
    
    We meet a corner case that build different DSC file, but the DSC file use
    same build output directory, and the different DSC file use a same PCD
    with different Pcd Type, it cause build failure.
    
    Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@xxxxxxxxx>
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
    Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 99adfe9f51cbe105ec12f0572571fc85762382fb
Author: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon May 22 22:01:26 2017 +0800

    BaseTools: Fix incremental build bug on DynamicPcd Token Generation
    
    During incremental build, we meet the bug that the different drivers use
    the different token for the same DynamicPcd.
    
    Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@xxxxxxxxx>
    Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
    Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel