[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xen: add sysfs node for guest type
On 05/22/2017 09:33 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 22/05/17 09:57, Juergen Gross wrote: >> Currently there is no reliable user interface inside a Xen guest to >> determine its type (e.g. HVM, PV or PVH). Instead of letting user mode >> try to determine this by various rather hacky mechanisms (parsing of >> boot messages before they are gone, trying to make use of known subtle >> differences in behavior of some instructions), add a sysfs node >> /sys/hypervisor/guest_type to explicitly deliver this information as >> it is known to the kernel. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor | 13 +++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 3 +++ >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 3 +++ >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c | 6 ++++-- >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 1 + >> drivers/xen/sys-hypervisor.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ >> include/xen/xen.h | 2 ++ >> 7 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor >> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor >> index 443196f0aa1c..06850f74ebd4 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor >> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor >> @@ -19,6 +19,19 @@ Contact: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Description: >> Compiler which was used to build the Xen hypervisor >> >> +What: /sys/hypervisor/guest_type >> +Date: May 2017 >> +KernelVersion: 4.12 >> +Contact: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> +Description: >> + Type of guest: >> + "native": standard guest type on arm >> + "HVM": fully virtualized guest (x86) >> + "PV": paravirtualized guest (x86) >> + "PVH": fully virtualized guest without legacy emulation (x86) >> + "PVHVM": fully virtualized guest using paravirtualized >> + interfaces (e.g. interrupts, timers) (x86) > I'm not sure this is wise split. PVHVM is a spectrum which changes > dynamically, especially in the presence of hardware APIC support. > > I'd suggest guest type being straight PV or HVM (being the container > type), and a list of items (interrupts, timers, legacy emulation) which > are either using paravirt or native interfaces, or are not used at all. Can these be exposed via HVM CPUID leaf? -boris _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |