[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [block-xen-blkback] question about pontential null pointer dereference



Hi Juergen,

Quoting Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>:

On 10/05/17 18:49, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

Hello everybody,

While looking into Coverity ID 1350942 I ran into the following piece of
code at drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c:490:

490static int xen_blkbk_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev)
491{
492        struct backend_info *be = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
493
494        pr_debug("%s %p %d\n", __func__, dev, dev->otherend_id);
495
496        if (be->major || be->minor)
497                xenvbd_sysfs_delif(dev);
498
499        if (be->backend_watch.node) {
500                unregister_xenbus_watch(&be->backend_watch);
501                kfree(be->backend_watch.node);
502                be->backend_watch.node = NULL;
503        }
504
505        dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, NULL);
506
507        if (be->blkif)
508                xen_blkif_disconnect(be->blkif);
509
510        /* Put the reference we set in xen_blkif_alloc(). */
511        xen_blkif_put(be->blkif);
512        kfree(be->mode);
513        kfree(be);
514        return 0;
515}

The issue here is that line 507 implies that be->blkif might be NULL. If
this is the case, there is a NULL pointer dereference when executing
line 511 once macro xen_blkif_put() dereference be->blkif

Is there any chance for be->blkif to be NULL at line 511?

Yes. xen_blkbk_probe() will call xen_blkbk_remove() with be->blkif being
NULL in the failure path.

The call to xen_blkif_put() should be guarded by the "if (be->blkif)" of
line 507, too.


Thanks for clarifying. I'll send a patch to fix this shortly.

--
Gustavo A. R. Silva







_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.