|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] VT-d PI: restrict the vcpu number on a given pcpu
Currently, a blocked vCPU is put in its pCPU's pi blocking list. If
too many vCPUs are blocked on a given pCPU, it will incur that the list
grows too long. After a simple analysis, there are 32k domains and
128 vcpu per domain, thus about 4M vCPUs may be blocked in one pCPU's
PI blocking list. When a wakeup interrupt arrives, the list is
traversed to find some specific vCPUs to wake them up. This traversal in
that case would consume much time.
To mitigate this issue, this patch limits the vcpu number on a given
pCPU, taking factors such as perfomance of common case, current hvm vcpu
count and current pcpu count into consideration. With this method, for
the common case, it works fast and for some extreme cases, the list
length is under control.
The change in vmx_pi_unblock_vcpu() is for the following case:
vcpu is running -> try to block (this patch may change NSDT to
another pCPU) but notification comes in time, thus the vcpu
goes back to running station -> VM-entry (we should set NSDT again,
reverting the change we make to NSDT in vmx_vcpu_block())
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index efff6cd..c0d0b58 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -100,16 +100,70 @@ void vmx_pi_per_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)
spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, cpu).lock);
}
+/*
+ * Choose an appropriate pcpu to receive wakeup interrupt.
+ * By default, the local pcpu is chosen as the destination. But if the
+ * vcpu number of the local pcpu exceeds a limit, another pcpu is chosen.
+ *
+ * Currently, choose (v_tot/p_tot) + K as the limit of vcpu, where
+ * v_tot is the total number of vcpus on the system, p_tot is the total
+ * number of pcpus in the system, and K is a fixed number. Experments shows
+ * the maximal time to wakeup a vcpu from a 128-entry blocking list is
+ * considered acceptable. So choose 128 as the fixed number K.
+ *
+ * This policy makes sure:
+ * 1) for common cases, the limit won't be reached and the local pcpu is used
+ * which is beneficial to performance (at least, avoid an IPI when unblocking
+ * vcpu).
+ * 2) for the worst case, the blocking list length scales with the vcpu count
+ * divided by the pcpu count.
+ */
+#define PI_LIST_FIXED_NUM 128
+#define PI_LIST_LIMIT (atomic_read(&num_hvm_vcpus) / num_online_cpus() + \
+ PI_LIST_FIXED_NUM)
+
+static unsigned int vmx_pi_choose_dest_cpu(struct vcpu *v)
+{
+ int count, limit = PI_LIST_LIMIT;
+ unsigned int dest = v->processor;
+
+ count = atomic_read(&per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, dest).counter);
+ while ( unlikely(count >= limit) )
+ {
+ dest = cpumask_cycle(dest, &cpu_online_map);
+ count = atomic_read(&per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, dest).counter);
+ }
+ return dest;
+}
+
static void vmx_vcpu_block(struct vcpu *v)
{
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned int dest;
+ unsigned int dest, dest_cpu;
spinlock_t *old_lock;
- spinlock_t *pi_blocking_list_lock =
- &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, v->processor).lock;
struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
+ spinlock_t *pi_blocking_list_lock;
+
+ /*
+ * After pCPU goes down, the per-cpu PI blocking list is cleared.
+ * To make sure the parameter vCPU is added to the chosen pCPU's
+ * PI blocking list before the list is cleared, just retry when
+ * finding the pCPU has gone down. Also retry to choose another
+ * pCPU when finding the list length reachs the limit.
+ */
+ retry:
+ dest_cpu = vmx_pi_choose_dest_cpu(v);
+ pi_blocking_list_lock = &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, dest_cpu).lock;
spin_lock_irqsave(pi_blocking_list_lock, flags);
+ if ( unlikely((!cpu_online(dest_cpu)) ||
+ (atomic_read(&per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, dest_cpu).counter) >=
+ PI_LIST_LIMIT)) )
+ {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(pi_blocking_list_lock, flags);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
old_lock = cmpxchg(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocking.lock, NULL,
pi_blocking_list_lock);
@@ -120,11 +174,11 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_block(struct vcpu *v)
*/
ASSERT(old_lock == NULL);
- atomic_inc(&per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, v->processor).counter);
- HVMTRACE_4D(PI_LIST_ADD, v->domain->domain_id, v->vcpu_id, v->processor,
- atomic_read(&per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, v->processor).counter));
+ atomic_inc(&per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, dest_cpu).counter);
+ HVMTRACE_4D(PI_LIST_ADD, v->domain->domain_id, v->vcpu_id, dest_cpu,
+ atomic_read(&per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, dest_cpu).counter));
list_add_tail(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocking.list,
- &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, v->processor).list);
+ &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, dest_cpu).list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(pi_blocking_list_lock, flags);
ASSERT(!pi_test_sn(pi_desc));
@@ -134,6 +188,13 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_block(struct vcpu *v)
ASSERT(pi_desc->ndst ==
(x2apic_enabled ? dest : MASK_INSR(dest, PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK)));
+ if ( unlikely(dest_cpu != v->processor) )
+ {
+ dest = cpu_physical_id(dest_cpu);
+ write_atomic(&pi_desc->ndst,
+ (x2apic_enabled ? dest : MASK_INSR(dest,
PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK)));
+ }
+
write_atomic(&pi_desc->nv, pi_wakeup_vector);
}
@@ -163,6 +224,7 @@ static void vmx_pi_unblock_vcpu(struct vcpu *v)
unsigned long flags;
spinlock_t *pi_blocking_list_lock;
struct pi_desc *pi_desc = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_desc;
+ unsigned int dest = cpu_physical_id(v->processor);
/*
* Set 'NV' field back to posted_intr_vector, so the
@@ -170,6 +232,8 @@ static void vmx_pi_unblock_vcpu(struct vcpu *v)
* it is running in non-root mode.
*/
write_atomic(&pi_desc->nv, posted_intr_vector);
+ write_atomic(&pi_desc->ndst,
+ x2apic_enabled ? dest : MASK_INSR(dest, PI_xAPIC_NDST_MASK));
pi_blocking_list_lock = v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocking.lock;
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |